4.19.2026
MAGA's War
I'm afraid this will be called the Iranian War but that's not really fair.
Netanyahu/Israel and AIPAC backed US politicians have been call for bombing Iran for years. Trump and MAGA finally pulled the trigger.
So how about the Bibi-Trump-AIPAC war?
How's it going?
Iran War: Mad King Trump Gets the Strait Slammed in His Face
4.17.2026
Trump Says...
"... Trump voices confidence" ?
Just another way of saying "Trump Says .." which we know has, at best, a 25% chance of being correct.
Fine job CNN.
4.16.2026
Trump
I'd rather spend the money on health care or child care for US workers.
Trump plans new arch twice as tall as Lincoln Memorial - this is where it would go
Israel - Iran
I really don't remember any headlines like this that started with Iran instead of Israel.
Who's the real trouble maker in the middle east.
Israeli attacks destroy key bridge linking southern Lebanon with rest of country
Satellite images reveal scale of Israeli demolitions as Lebanese villages destroyed
4.15.2026
Trump Says ...
Evaluating "Trump Says ..."
From an AI.
If you see a headline starting with "Trump says," statistically:
There is roughly a 1 in 10 chance it is a fully accurate factual statement.
There is a 1 in 4 chance that a specific policy promise will be fully realized.
There is a 3 in 4 chance the statement contains significant factual
errors or will be rated as "False" by independent monitors.
So this has a 10-25% of coming true.
US-Iran peace talks could resume in next two days, Trump says
I don't think he has a clue, he's just trying to keep a lid on a US Stock Market crash and Oil price increases.
Ceasefire
About that other ceasefire.
Israeli attacks kill 11, including two children, in day of strikes on Gaza
4.13.2026
Trump Says ...
I asked an AI this question.
Since 2016 I see headlines that start with "Trump says ...." it seems to me that a huge portion of what "Trump Says..." ends up not happening, completely wrong, or utter BS. Can you give me any idea of what percntage of "Trump says..." are actually true or happen?
The short answer.
Summary for your Research:
If you see a headline starting with "Trump says," statistically:
There is roughly a 1 in 10 chance it is a fully accurate factual statement.
There is a 1 in 4 chance that a specific policy promise will be fully realized.
There is a 3 in 4 chance the statement contains significant factual errors or will be rated as "False" by independent monitors.
The complete answer.
Quantifying the accuracy of Donald Trump’s statements is a significant task that various non-partisan and media organizations have tracked since 2016. Because "Trump says" can refer to factual claims, campaign promises, or predictions, the percentages vary depending on the category.
Here is a breakdown of the data based on historical tracking from his first term and the beginning of his current term (2025–2026).
1. Factual Accuracy (The "Truth" Meter)
Fact-checkers distinguish between "claims of fact" (e.g., "The trade deficit is at a record high") and opinions.
PolitiFact: As of 2024–2026, their scorecard for over 1,000 checked statements shows that only about 3-4% of his claims are rated as "True." If you include "Mostly True," the number rises to roughly 12%.
The Washington Post: Their "Fact Checker" database documented 30,573 false or misleading claims during his first four-year term—an average of about 21 per day. They even created a "Bottomless Pinocchio" category for claims he repeated more than 20 times despite being corrected.
Overall Breakdown:
True/Mostly True: ~12%
Half True: ~12%
Mostly False/False/Pants on Fire: ~76%
2. Campaign Promises (The "Happening" Meter)
This measures whether the things he says he will do actually occur. These are often rated by "Promise Trackers."
| Status | 1st Term (2017–2021) | 2nd Term (Current to 2026) |
| Promises Kept | ~23% | ~19% |
| Compromise/In Works | ~22% | ~49% |
| Promises Broken | ~55% | ~1% (Many are still "In Works") |
| Stalled | 0% (Finalized) | ~31% |
Data source: PolitiFact "Trump-O-Meter" and "MAGA-Meter" (2026 updates).
3. The "Bullshit" Factor
In political science, there is a technical distinction between a lie (knowing the truth and saying the opposite) and bullshit (speaking without regard for what the truth is to achieve a specific effect).
Critics and analysts often argue that a high percentage of "Trump says" falls into the latter category—rhetoric designed to dominate a news cycle or "flood the zone" rather than convey a literal policy plan. For example, his promise to end the Ukraine-Russia war in "24 hours" was recently rated as a Broken Promise by PolitiFact after negotiations in Geneva failed to reach a resolution by February 2026.
Summary for your Research:
If you see a headline starting with "Trump says," statistically:
There is roughly a 1 in 10 chance it is a fully accurate factual statement.
There is a 1 in 4 chance that a specific policy promise will be fully realized.
There is a 3 in 4 chance the statement contains significant factual errors or will be rated as "False" by independent monitors.
References:
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)