Headline #1: [NASA Study: Global Warming Alarmists Wrong]
Headline #2: [New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism]
Headline #3: [Global Warming Doomsters' Theories Wrong, Says NASA Study]
headline #4: [NASA Study Shatters Climate Alarmists’ Assumptions]
All the articles play this up as a NASA study but I don't think it is. One of the articles says based on "NASA satellite data" but I don't see anywhere this is a NASA study. The NASA global climate site is here, [NASA Climate], look for yourself to see how NASA feels about global warming.
They also present the study as destroying the global warming theory but again I don't think it really does. First of all, it's a damned complex article and I'd bet the farm that none of writers above, read or understood it. They're taking someone's word for what it means. Finally, here the last line of the abstract of the study and it sure doesn't sound like "Global Warming Doomsters' Theories Wrong" to me.
It is concluded that atmospheric feedback diagnosis of the climate system remains an unsolved problem, due primarily to the inability to distinguish between radiative forcing and radiative feedback in satellite radiative budget observations.
The study is here [Study that blows the global warming alarmist theories away?], read it and see if you agree.
tnb
No comments:
Post a Comment